Literature Review: Elements and Criteria Methodology of Enterprise Architecture for E-Government

ari cahaya puspitaningrum



Enterprise Architecture (EA) has become a major requirement for organizations to addresses business, data, infrastructure, and information systems. EA Implementation in the government is considered very important to improve the efficiency of electronic-based services. The documentation process is challenging and is often seen as very time consuming, error-prone, and requires the collection of quality data. To create a successful, it requires to emphasize the aspects of EA development properly to prevent failure of the documentation. So, this study aims to identify the aspects of how to develop EA for e-government. The method of this study was literature review of 30 previous studies that related with the topic. Thus, this study analyzed and synthesized the studies and it can be mapped into 2 categories. The mapping consists of 1) elements and 2) criteria methodology of EA development for e-government. The findings are 23  and 11 criteria methodology of development for e-government. This study also provides some reference for further research and also provides insight into EA development for e-government that will be used by practitioners.

Keywords: enterprise architecture, e-Government, e-Government EA, EA methodology



Arsitektur perusahaan telah menjadi kebutuhan utama bagi organisasi untuk mengembangkan bisnis, data, infrastruktur, dan sistem informasi. Penerapan arsitektur perusahaan di pemerintahan dinilai sangat penting untuk meningkatkan efisiensi layanan berbasis elektronik. Proses dokumentasi cukup menantang dan sering kali dianggap sangat memakan waktu, rawan kesalahan, dan memerlukan pengumpulan data yang berkualitas. Untuk menciptakan kesuksesan, perlu adanya penekanan pada aspek pengembangan arsitektur perusahaan dengan baik untuk mencegah kegagalan pendokumentasian. Jadi, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi aspek bagaimana mengembangkan arsitektur perusahaan untuk e-government. Metode penelitian ini adalah studi pustaka dari 30 penelitian sebelumnya yang berhubungan dengan topik. Dengan demikian, studi ini menganalisis dan mensintesis studi tersebut dan dapat dipetakan menjadi 2 kategori. Pemetaan terdiri dari 1) elemen dan 2) metodologi kriteria pengembangan arsitektur perusahaan untuk e-government. Temuan tersebut adalah 23 dan 11 kriteria metodologi pengembangan e-government. Studi ini juga memberikan beberapa referensi untuk penelitian selanjutnya dan juga memberikan wawasan tentang pengembangan arsitektur perusahaan untuk e-government yang akan digunakan oleh para praktisi.

Kata Kunci: arsitektur perusahaan, arsitektur perusahaan e-Government, e-Government, metodologi arsitektur perusahaan

Full Text:



D. Rouhani, M. N. Mahrin, R. B. Ahmad, and P. Nikfard, “A systematic literature review on Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodologies.,” Information and Software Technology., 2015, doi:

J. Shekkerman, “Trends in Enterprise Architecture,” 2004. 2004%20IFEAD.PDF.

T. Iyamu, “Implementation Of The Enterprise Architecture Through The Zachman Framework,” Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 2013.

J. Siltanen, “Enterprise Architecture in the Finnish public sector – It’s the law.,” 2015.

M. Hauder, F. Matthes, and S. Roth, “Challenges for automated Enterprise Architecture Documentation,” Springer, pp. 21–39, 2012.

Roth, S., Hauder, M., “Enterprise Architecture Documentation: Current Practices and Future Directions,” 2013.

M. Farwick, C. M. Schweda, R. Breu, and I. Hanschke, “A situational method for semi-automated Enterprise Architecture Documentation,” Springer-Verl Berl Heidelb, 2014, doi: // 10.1007/s10270-014-0407-3.

E. Rasdiana and Y. Bandung, “A Centralized Design of Information Network Architecture for Local Government : Case Study of Hulu Sungai Selatan Regency,” IEEE, 2016.

C. M. Firmansyah and Yoanes, “Designing an Enterprise Architecture Government Organization Based on TOGAF ADM and SONA,” IEEE Conf., 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICITSI.2016.7858191.

W. D. Sunindyo, S. Akbar, and Mohammad Iqbal, “Towards a Smart World Class City : Case: Building Bandung ICT Master Plan,” IEEE, 2013, doi: 10.1109/ICTSS.2013.6588102.

I. Y. M. Edward, W. Shalannanda, and Susmini Indriani Lestariningati, “E-Government Master Plan Design with TOGAF Framework : Case Study: Payakumbuh City Government, Indonesia,” IEEE Conf., 2014, doi: 10.1109/TSSA.2014.7065957.

E. Putro, A. N. Hidayanto, Meyliana, and Harjanto Prabowo, “The Alignment Factors of Business-IT on Enterprise Architecture : a Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE, 2017.

A. E. J. E. Egeten, H. Prabowo, Meyliana, M. Hapsara, and Raymond Kosala, “The General Components of Enterprise Architecture Framework in e-Commerce: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Conf., 2017.

D. D. Dang and S. Pekkola, “Systematic Literature Review on Enterprise Architecture in the Public Sector,” 2016.

J. S. Aier, “Understanding processes for model-based enterprise transformation planning,” Int. J. Internet Enterprise Manage., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 84–103, 2011.

B. A. Kitchenham and S. Charters, Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, 10th ed. 2007.

B. Iyer and R. Gottlieb, “The Four-Domain Architecture: An approach to support enterprise architecture design,” IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, vol. 43, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2004.

C. Batini, G. Viscusi, and D. Cherubini, “GovQual: A quality driven methodology for E-Government project planning,” Government Information Quarterly, 2009.

S. Buckl, F. Matthes, S. Roth, Christopher Schulz, and Christian M. Schweda, “A Conceptual Framework for Enterprise Architecture Design,” Springer Berl. Heidelb., doi:

X. Wang, Xiongwei Zhou, and Longbin Jiang, “A Method of Business and IT Alignment Based on Enterprise Architecture,” IEEE, 2008, doi: 10.1109/SOLI.2008.4686496.

N. B. Kurniawan and Suhardi, “Enterprise Architecture Design for Ensuring Strategic Business IT Alignment (Integrating SAMM with TOGAF 9.1),” IEEE Conf., 2013, doi: 10.1109/rICT-ICeVT.2013.6741505.

R. Delima, H. B. Santoso, and J. Purwadi, “Architecture Vision for Indonesian Integrated Agriculture Information Systems Using TOGAF Framework.,” IEEE, 2016, doi: 10.1109/IAC.2016.7905691.

F. Belanger and J. S. Hiller, “A framework for e-government: privacy implications,” Bus. Process Manag. J., 2006, doi:

N. D. Mamaghani, F. M. Madani, and Ali Sharifi, “Customer oriented enterprise IT architecture framework,” Elsevier, 2011, doi:

R. Winter and R. Fischer, “Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture,” IEEE, 2006.

Z. Ebrahim and Z. Irani, “E-government adoption: architecture and barriers,” Business Process Management Journal, vol. 11, no. 15, Art. no. 15, 2005, doi:

M. Dadashzadeh, “A New Methodology For Developing The MIS Master Plan,” 10.19030/rbis.v13i1.4333, vol. 13, 2009, doi: 10.19030/rbis.v13i1.4333.

B. Fritscher and Y. Pigneur, “Business IT Alignment from Business Model to Enterprise Architecture,” Springer Berl. Heidelb., vol. 83, 2011, doi:

S. Gregor, D. Hart, and N. Martin, “Enterprise architectures: enablers of business strategy and IS/IT alignment in government,” Information Technology & People, 2007, doi:

F. Nikpay, R. B. Ahmad, B. D. Rouhani, Mohd Naz’ri Mahrin, and Shahaboddin Shamshirband, “An effective Enterprise Architecture Implementation Methodology,” Springer-Verl. Berl. Heidelb., 2017, doi: DOI 10.1007/s10257-016-0336-5.

B. Iyer and R. Gottlieb, “The Four-Domain Architecture: An approach to support enterprise architecture design,” IBM SYSTEMS JOURNAL, vol. 43, no. 3, 2004.

A. Wegmann, I. Rychkova, G. Regev, and L.-S. Lê, “Business and IT Alignment with SEAM for Enterprise Architecture,” 2007, doi: 10.1109/EDOC.2007.54.

N. Lim, T. Lee, and S. Park, “A Comparative Analysis of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Based on EA Quality Attributes,” 2009, doi: 10.1109/SNPD.2009.97.

R. Rouhani, B. Darvish, F. Nikpay, Mohd Naz’ri Mahrin, and Pourya Nikfard, “A Comparison of the Top Four Enterprise- Architecture Methodologies,” International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia, 2013.

M. A. Mohamed, G. H. Galal-Edeen, H. A. Hassan, and Ehab Ezzat Hasanien, “An Evaluation of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks for E-Government,” IEEE, 2012.

M. Kostoska, M. Gusev, and K. Kiroski, “Evaluation methodology for national enterprise architecture frameworks,” in ICT Innovations 2010 Web Proceedings, 2010.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 710 times
PDF - 258 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.