The Analysis of Extended Technology Acceptance Model to Understand use of Platform at Education Technology Startup

Heru Wijayanto Aripradono

Abstract


The growth of startups in Indonesia Education Technology (EdTech) has increased significantly and related with the growth of EdTech globally. Related to the pandemic and the need for future skills, it is a moment for EdTech startups, to build a process, approach and strategy for teaching-learning activities to be able to produce someone with the skills needed in the future. The purpose of this research is to see how the technology-based learning process in EdTech startups can be used and adapted by users in improving their skills and needs in the future. This research uses the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework by adding facilitating condition variables as extended factors to see how the user's environmental conditions help encourage and adapt the use of technology. This research uses a quantitative method where data collection is carried out to students who are still active in EdTech startups Indonesia in the period 2016 - 2022 and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results illustrate that TAM has been able to explain the factors that predict the use of e-learning among users on the Edtech Startup platform in supporting the learning process. Then there is a significant relationship between facilitating condition variables with ease of use and perceived benefits. In addition, the results of this study illustrate a significant relationship between the core components TAM framework and will enrich the academic literature in understanding the conditions of learning platforms in the EdTech sector to support the needs of skills and competencies in the future.

Full Text:

PDF

References


We Are Social and HootSuite, “Digital 2021 - Indonesia,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-indonesia

S. Kemp, “Digital 2021 October Global Statshot Report — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights,” Kepios, 2021. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-october-global-statshot (accessed Dec. 17, 2021).

S. Kemp, “Digital in Indonesia: All the Statistics You Need in 2021 — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights,” 2021. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-indonesia (accessed Dec. 17, 2021).

CNN, “Pengguna Internet Kala WFH Corona Meningkat 40 Persen di RI,” CNN Indonesia, 2020. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20200408124947-213-491594/pengguna-internet-kala-wfh-corona-meningkat-40-persen-di-ri

K. Das, M. Gryseels, P. Sudhir, and K. T. Tan, “Unlocking Indonesia’s Digital Opportunity,” McKinsey & Company, 2016.

DSResearch and DailySocial, “Transforming Education : Edtech Report 2020,” 2020.

R. Bhardwaj, N. Yarrow, and M. Cali, EdTech in Indonesia. Washington DC: World Bank Group, 2020. doi: 10.1596/33762.

World Bank, Indonesia Economic Quarterly, June 2018. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2018. doi: 10.1596/29921.

R. Hartley, Kinshuk, R. Koper, T. Okamoto, and J. M. Spector, “The education and training of learning technologists: A competences approach,” Educational Technology and Society, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 206–216, 2010.

R. Huang, J. M. Spector, and J. Yang, Educational Technology a Primer for the 21st Century. 2019.

R. Bhardwaj, N. Yarrow, and M. Cali, EdTech in Indonesia. World Bank, 2020. doi: 10.1596/33762.

World Bank, “Mapping Indonesia’s Civil Service,” Washington DC, 2018.

A. Adhiat, “Jumlah Mahasiswa di Indonesia, dari Aceh sampai Papua,” Databoks, Sep. 05, 2022. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/09/05/jumlah-mahasiswa-di-indonesia-dari-aceh-sampai-papua (accessed Feb. 15, 2023).

Daily Social, “Startup Report 2020: Business Resiliency during the Pandemic,” no. 55958, p. 50, 2020.

W. E. Forum, “The Future of Jobs Report 2020,” 2020.

S. Zhang, J. Zhao, and W. Tan, “Extending TAM for Online Learning Systems: An Intrinsic Motivation Perspective,” Tsinghua Sci Technol, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 312–317, 2008, doi: 10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70050-6.

P. E. Ramírez-Correa, J. Arenas-Gaitán, and F. J. Rondán-Cataluña, “Gender and acceptance of e-learning: A multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college students in Chile and Spain,” PLoS One, 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140460.

H. Mohammadi, “Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model,” Comput Human Behav, vol. 45, pp. 359–374, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044.

R. Inderawati, M. Eko Purnomo, M. Vianty, and D. Suhendi, “Students’ Engagement in Utilizing Technology For Learning Support,” Academic Journal of English Language and Education, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019.

P. Kakada, Y. Deshpande, and S. Bisen, “Technology support, social support, academic support, service support, and student satisfaction,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, vol. 18, 2019, doi: 10.28945/4461.

L. Stošić, “The importance of educational technology in teaching,” International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 2015.

A. Januszewski and M. Molenda, Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York: Routledge, 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203054000.

H. Song and T. Kidd, Handbook of research on human performance and instructional technology. 2009. doi: 10.4018/978-1-60566-782-9.

S. Sukendro et al., “Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context,” Heliyon, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.

T. Kim and W. Chiu, “Consumer acceptance of sports wearable technology: the role of technology readiness,” International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 2019, doi: 10.1108/IJSMS-06-2017-0050.

F. D. Davis, “A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results,” Management, vol. Ph.D., no. January 1985, p. 291, 1985, doi: oclc/56932490.

V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies,” Manage Sci, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

V. Venkatesh, M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis, “Technology Acceptance Model - Research,” MIS Quarterly, 2003.

P. Lai, “The Literature Review Of Technology Adoption Models And Theories For The Novelty Technology,” Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 2017, doi: 10.4301/s1807-17752017000100002.

J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson, Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition. 2014.

R. B. Kline, “Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (4th ed.),” Methodology in the Social Sciences, 2015.

I. Budiati et al., “Profil Generasi Milenial Indonesia,” pp. 1–153, 2018.

T. Teo, G. Sang, B. Mei, and C. K. W. Hoi, “Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: a Chinese perspective,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 530–546, May 2019, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v12i2.2732

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 414 times
PDF - 137 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.