Digital Transformation and Performance Optimization at XYZ Higher Education through TOGAF-Based Enterprise Architecture

Widia Febriyani, Samsudin Samsudin

Abstract


Information technology (IT) has become an indispensable component of the corporate landscape in the digital age, reshaping how organizations operate. The rapid development of IT has revolutionized traditional business methods, transforming them into more efficient, technology-driven operations. Companies and institutions worldwide increasingly focus on digitalization to integrate business processes, streamline workflows, and enhance productivity. XYZ University in Indonesia, as an educational institution, is not immune to this shift. To stay competitive and efficient, the university aims to implement fundamental principles of coordination and integration within its internal structure and with external partners. A central goal of XYZ University’s digital transformation efforts is to streamline its business processes and bolster its cybersecurity framework. These initiatives are critical to the university’s broader strategy of developing a robust Enterprise Architecture (EA). This research focuses on the Academic Directorate and addresses three fundamental domains: business processes, data and information management, and application systems. By concentrating on these areas, the research aims to develop an EA blueprint to provide a comprehensive framework for enhancing the university’s digital capabilities. This blueprint is intended to serve as a strategic solution for integrating information systems, ensuring smooth data flow across departments, and improving the overall efficiency of business processes within the institution. It will help XYZ University achieve its digital transformation goals in the long term, leading to better coordination, more robust security, and higher operational efficiency.

Full Text:

PDF

References


D. Dang-Pham, A.-P. Hoang, D.-T. Vo, and K. Kautz, “Digital Kaizen: An Approach to Digital Transformation,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 26, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3127/ajis.v26i0.3851.

S. Tahir, Rusdin, Budi Harto, Arief Yanto Rukmana, Rino Subekti, Ervina Waty, Agatha Christy Situru, Transformasi Bisnis di Era Digital (Teknologi Informasi dalam Mendukung Transformasi Bisnis di Era Digital), no. August. 2023.

P. C. Verhoef et al., “Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda,” J Bus Res, vol. 122, no. January, pp. 889–901, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.

K. Nam, S. W. Oh, S. K. Kim, J. Goo, and M. Sajid Khan, “Dynamics of enterprise architecture in the Korean public sector: Transformational change vs. transactional change,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 8, no. 11, 2016, doi: 10.3390/su8111074.

F. G. E. L. Ratu and M. N. N. Sitokdana, “Architectural Design Using the Enterprise Information System Architecture Planning (EAP) Library and Archive Department of Salatiga City,” Tepian, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 61–66, 2020, doi: 10.51967/tepian.v1i2.114.

M. Thirasakthana and S. Kiattisin, “Sustainable government enterprise architecture framework,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–27, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13020879.

T. Gkrimpizi, V. Peristeras, and I. Magnisalis, “Classification of Barriers to Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: Systematic Literature Review,” Educ Sci (Basel), vol. 13, no. 7, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13070746.

L. M. Castro Benavides, J. A. Tamayo Arias, M. D. Arango Serna, J. W. Branch Bedoya, and D. Burgos, “Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors (Basel), vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1–22, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20113291.

A. Sulistiawati et al., “Analisis Manajemen Risiko pada Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Sekolah Menggunakan ISO 31000 : 2018 Risk Management Analysis of School Management Information Systems,” vol. 13, pp. 2020–2032, 2024.

P. S. Informasi, F. T. Informasi, U. Kristen, and S. Wacana, “Analisis Manajemen Risiko pada PT . XYZ Menggunakan Risk Management Analysis of PT XYZ Using COBIT 2019 with Domain,” vol. 13, pp. 2033–2047, 2024.

S. Sahni, S. Verma, and R. P. S. Kaurav, “Understanding digital transformation challenges for online learning and teaching in higher education institutions: a review and research framework,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. ahead-of-p, no. ahead-of-print, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0245.

C. G. Marques, L. Mateus, and I. Araújo, “Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study at Polytechnic University of Tomar,” in Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions, A. de Bem Machado, M. J. Sousa, F. Dal Mas, S. Secinaro, and D. Calandra, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 41–58. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-52296-3_3.

A. Yudhistira and A. N. Fajar, “Integrating TOGAF and Big Data for Digital Transformation: Case Study on the Lending Industry,” Sinkron, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1215–1225, 2024, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13648.

S. A. Wulandari, A. P. Dewi, M. Rizki Pohan, D. I. Sensuse, M. Mishbah, and Syamsudin, “Risk assessment and recommendation strategy based on COBIT 5 for risk: Case study sikn Jikn helpdesk service,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 161, pp. 168–177, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.112.

M. N. Aleksandrov, V. A. Vasiliev, and S. V Aleksandrova, “Implementation of the Risk-based Approach Methodology in Information Security Management Systems,” in 2021 International Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS), 2021, pp. 137–139. doi: 10.1109/ITQMIS53292.2021.9642767.

K. Monita, A. Erfina, and C. Warman, “Perancangan Enterprise Architecture Menggunakan Framework TOGAF Architecture Development Method ( TOGAF-ADM) Pada SMK Bina Mandiri 2,” SISMATIK (Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen Informatika), pp. 327–334, 2021.

The Open Group, “The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2,” The Open Group, p. 504, 2018.

Y. P. Putra and A. Hadiana, “Designing Enterprise Architecture for Public Health Center Based on TOGAF Architecture Development Method,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 879, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012163.

J. Bumann and M. Peter, “Action fields of digital transformation–a review and comparative analysis of digital transformation maturity models and frameworks,” Digitalisierung und andere Innovationsformen im Management, vol. 2, no. November, pp. 13–40, 2019.

F. Zaoui and N. Souissi, “Roadmap for digital transformation: A literature review,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 175, pp. 621–628, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.090.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v13i6.4630

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 19 times
PDF - 5 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.