Selection of the Best Marketplace using SAW and WP Methods: A Case Study of Bekasi City

Esa Hadistra, Raden Supriyanto

Abstract


In today’s digital era, e-commerce has made transactions between sellers and buyers easier by eliminating the need for face-to-face interaction. The abundance of available marketplaces often makes it difficult for consumers to choose the platform that best fits their needs. This study aims to provide recommendations for the best marketplace based on four key criteria: trust, user interface design, promotions, and product completeness. The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods were applied to support this decision-making process. The research was conducted on five popular marketplaces, with data collected through questionnaires distributed to 200 active respondents. Both SAW and WP methods were used to calculate the weight and score of each marketplace based on consumer preferences regarding the predefined criteria. The results show that Shopee ranked as the top marketplace, achieving the highest scores of 0.99 (SAW) and 5.77 (WP), due to its strengths in trust, promotional offers, and product variety. Tokopedia placed second, with scores of 0.98 (SAW) and 5.75 (WP), excelling in its more intuitive user interface design.
Other marketplaces showed strengths in specific criteria but were unable to surpass Shopee and Tokopedia in the final scores. These findings provide valuable insights for consumers in selecting the most suitable marketplace for their needs, and for marketplace operators seeking to improve service quality based on consumer-prioritized criteria.

Keywords


Marketplace; Weighted Product; WP; Simple Additive Weight; SAW; Ranking

Full Text:

PDF

References


Maharani, D., Helmiah, F., & Rahmadani, N., “Penyuluhan Manfaat menggunakan Internet dan Website pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19” Abdiformatika: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Informatika, 1(1), 1–7, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.25008/abdiformatika.v1i1.130

Nadhifa, Abidathun. “Pengaruh Motivasi Belanja Hedonis dan Promosi Penjualan terhadap Pembelian Impulsif” Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen dan Inovasi Bisnis, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 34-52, 2020. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.47201/jamin.v2i2.51

Iswara, Danu. “Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Kemudahan, Kualitas Informasi, dan Persepsi Risiko terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Studi Kasus pada Pengguna Media Sosial Instagram di Kota Yogyakarta)” Jurnal. Yogyakarta: UNY. 2016.

Wati, Anggi Sukma. Pengaruh Kepercayaan Konsumen terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Merchandise K-Pop toko online Rionyx Shop di Instagram. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim. 2023.

MH Setiawan, R Komarudin, DN Kholifah "Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Tampilan dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Pemilihan Aplikasi Marketplace." Jurnal Infortech, 4(2), 139-147, 2022. doi:https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/infortech/article/view/13913.

Handoko, B. “Pengaruh Promosi, Harga dan Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen pada Titipan Kilat JNE Medan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 18(1), 61–72, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.30596/jimb.v18i1.1098

Muchlisin, Mayani Kurnianty. Pengaruh Kualitas Produk, Harga dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Pembelian di Marketplace Shopee ( Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Umsu ). 2021.

Zulkifli, A., & Anah, L. “Pengaruh Harga dan Kelengkapan Produk terhadap Keputusan Pembelian di B2 Variasi Motor Jombang.” Journal of Business and Innovation Management. 3(3), 259–270, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.33752/bima.v3i3.5486

Laila, F., & Sindar, A. Penentuan Supplier Bahan Baku Restaurant XO Suki menggunakan Metode Weighted Product. Jurnal Teknologi dan Ilmu Komputer Prima (JUTIKOMP), 2(1), 272-275, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.34012/jutikomp.v2i1.412

Ningtyas, R., & Suyatno, D. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Bantuan Langsung Tunai pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19 menggunakan Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dan Fuzzy Berbasis Website (Studi Kasus : Desa Krisik, Kecamatan Gandusari, Kabupaten Blitar)”. Journal Of Emerging Information System And Business Intelligence (JEISBI), 2(2), 56-65, 2022. doi: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/JEISBI/article/view/39672

Setiawan, M. I., Komarudin, R., & Kholifah, D. N. “Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Tampilan, dan Promosi terhadap Keputusan Pemilihan Aplikasi Marketplace”. Jurnal Infotech, Volume 4 No 2, 139-147, 2022. doi: http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/infortech

Pudjiarti, E., & Tabrani, M. “Analisis Survei Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap E-Commerce Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting”. Elkom: Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer, 14(2), 286-300, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.51903/elkom.v14i2.532

Dodi Guswandi, Hadi Syahputra, M. Hafizh, Rita, & Devia Kartika. “Analisis Metode Weighted Product dalam menentukan Order Barang Terbaik pada Marketplace Shopee.” Jurnal KomtekInfo. 9(2), 55-60, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.35134/komtekinfo.v9i2.277.

Wahyuni, R. E., & Kurniawati, A. “Pemilihan Marketplace Terbaik dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Studi Kasus: Kota Curup, Rejang Lebong, Bengkulu.” CogITo Smart Journal, 9(2), 317–327, 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v9i2.492.317-327

Hutahaean, W., & Hasugian, P. S. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Bedah Rumah menggunakan Metode Weighted Product pada Kecamatan Borbor.” Jurnal Nasional Komputasi dan Teknologi Informasi (JNKTI), 4(1), 113–117, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.32672/jnkti.v4i1.2751

Sambani, E. B., Agustin, Y. H., & Marlina, R. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kenaikan Jabatan Karyawan Plaza Asia dengan menggunakan Metode Weighted Product.” CSRID (Computer Science Research and Its Development Journal), 8(2), 121-130, 2016.

Sulistiyanto, U.Apsiswanto and A. Setiawan “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam menentukan Keluarga Miskin (Studi Kasus: Desa Nampirejo)” JCOSYS -Journal Computer Science and Information System, 2(1), 10-18, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.53514/jc.v1i2.199




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v15i2.4846

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 5 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.