Application of the Weighted Product Method and Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) for Selecting Recipients of the Family Hope Program (PKH)

Indah Kusuma Wardhani, Wiwit Agus Triyanto, Supriyono Supriyono

Abstract


The Family Hope Program (PKH) is a social assistance initiative aimed at improving the welfare of underprivileged families through conditional cash transfers. In the selection process for recipients, this study directly compares two Decision Support System methods: the Weighted Product method and the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART). These methods employ different calculation approaches; the Weighted Product method uses multiplication, where higher weights have a greater influence on ranking, while the SMART method utilizes linear addition after normalization, which can affect the ranking results. Previous studies generally used only one method or compared similar methods. The criteria used include welfare indicators aligned with the Family Hope Program (PKH), making the results more relevant for decision-making in the context of social assistance. These indicators include pregnant women, the number of toddlers, the number of elementary school children, the number of middle school children, the number of high school children, employment status, income, and housing conditions. The results indicate that both methods yield the same ranking order, although there are differences in the final scores. From 20 alternative data points, five residents of Bugel Village were identified as the most eligible to receive PKH assistance: SH, ZD, SF, SU, and HP.

Keywords


family hope program, weighted product, simple multi-attribute rating technique, decision support system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistika, “Kemiskinan Provinsi Jawa Tengah 2024,” Badan Pusat Statistika Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 2024. https://jateng.bps.go.id/id/pressrelease/2024/07/01/1523/kemiskinan-provinsi-jawa--tengah-maret-2024.html (accessed Oct. 27, 2024).

H. Fathi and M. Rosmeida, “Penerapan Algoritma Weighted Product Method (WPM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk menentukan Calon Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan,” J. Informatics …, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/jiac/article/view/3852%0Ahttps://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/jiac/article/download/3852/1939

E. Agustina, N. Ransi, L. S. La Surimi, A. Tenriawaru, and L. O. Saidi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan menggunakan Metode Weighted Product (Studi Kasus : Kelurahan Wandoka Utara),” J. Mat. Komputasi dan Stat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 76–84, 2022, doi: 10.33772/jmks.v2i2.11.

W. R. K. Jayawardani and M. Maryam, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan dengan Implementasi Metode SAW dan Pembobotan ROC,” Emit. J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 2022, doi: 10.23917/emitor.v22i2.18411.

A. Riani and N. Nurahman, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) menggunakan Metode TOPSIS dan Metode WP,” J. Innov. Inf. Technol. Appl., vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 107–117, 2020, doi: 10.35970/jinita.v2i02.331.

D. A. W. Prapto, R. Sipahutar, and M. Purwaningsih, “Web-based Decision Support System for Best Employee Selection in Government Institutions using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method,” Sistemasi, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 889, 2024, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v13i3.2796.

Moh.Subhan, “No Title Implementasi Metode Weighted Product,” Redaksiana, 2021. https://redaksi.pens.ac.id/2021/01/11/implementasi-metode-weighted-product/ (accessed Oct. 27, 2024).

J. Kuswanto, A. F. Wulandari, I. Yani, Sheyla Rizky Novanto Samudra, and J. Dapiokta, “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product (WP) untuk menentukan Penerimaan BLT di Desa Rawasari,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 503–508, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://djournals.com/klik

Ignatius Joko, Nur Aziz, and Wahyu Darmawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Perpanjangan Kontrak Kerja Karyawan dengan Metode SMART,” MAMEN J. Manaj., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2023, doi: 10.55123/mamen.v2i1.903.

I. D. Putranto and D. Maulina, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode SMART Untuk menentukan Guru Terbaik Decision Support System using the SMART Method to Determine the Best Teacher,” JACIS J. Autom. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 92–102, 2023.

F. Akbar and N. Nasution, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan menentukan Kinerja Karyawan menggunakan Metode SMART dan SAW (Studi Kasus PT. RAPP Estate Mandau),” J-Com (Journal Comput., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2022, doi: 10.33330/j-com.v2i2.1726.

A. H. Albarqi, F. Rosman, S. Lestari, and C. Fauzi, “Perbandingan Simple Additive Weighting dan Weighted Product pada Penerimaan Bantuan Raskin,” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.35957/jtsi.v5i1.6997.

H. R. Kusuma and N. Damastuti, “Wireless Stereo di Joss Gandos Ponsel Bratang Metode SMART ( Simple Multi Attribut Rating Technique ),” vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 9999–10005, 2024.

N. S. Jaya Putri and K. Hati, “Implementasi Metode SMART pada Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa Tingkat Tinggi di Lembaga Amil Zakat,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 50–58, 2022, doi: 10.51998/jti.v8i2.502.

A. Nuzulia, “Implementasi Metode Smart berbasis Web dalam membuat Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Smartphone sesuai Kebutuhan Masyarakat pada Marketplace Tokopedia,” J. Ilm. Hosp. 709, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2022.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v14i2.5080

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 195 times
PDF - 56 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.