Simple Selection Index (SSI) Method in Electric Vehicle Selection for Logistics Companies

Hadi Hikmadyo Bisono, Ema Utami

Abstract


The rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs) has encouraged various industrial sectors, including logistics, to transition from fossil fuel-based vehicles to more environmentally friendly solutions. While EVs offer advantages such as energy efficiency, reduced carbon emissions, and lower operating costs, selecting the right electric vehicle for a logistics company is not a straightforward task. The main challenge lies in the wide variety of available models, each with different technical and operational specifications. This complexity increases as companies must consider multiple criteria such as price, payload capacity, vehicle width, battery capacity, and cargo volume. Therefore, a systematic approach is needed to support decision-making. One commonly used approach is the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method. This study introduces the Simple Selection Index (SSI) method, a newly developed MCDM approach designed as a simplified version of the Preference Selection Index (PSI) method. The novelty of SSI lies in its ability to eliminate complex steps such as the calculation of preference variation values and preference deviation scores, making the ranking process more concise and easier to apply—without compromising the accuracy of the results. The study aims to evaluate the performance of the SSI method in selecting the most suitable electric vehicle by directly comparing its results with those of the PSI method, using a dataset comprising four vehicle alternatives and five key criteria: price, payload, width, battery capacity, and cargo volume. The findings show that the SSI method produces an identical ranking to the PSI method, with EV-4 as the top recommendation and EV-1 as the second-best alternative. With its more efficient process, the SSI method holds strong potential for application in fast and straightforward multi-criteria decision-making scenarios.

Keywords


Electric Vehicles; MCD; PSI Method; SSI Method; Alternative Method

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Puška, I. Stojanović, and A. Štilić, “The Influence of Objective Weight Determination Methods on Electric Vehicle Selection in Urban Logistics,” Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 117–129, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.56578/jimd020302.

B. Al-Hanahi, I. Ahmad, D. Habibi, P. Pradhan, and M. A. S. Masoum, “An Optimal Charging Solution for Commercial Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Access, Vol. 10, pp. 46162–46175, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171048.

S. Goel, R. Sharma, and A. K. Rathore, “A Review on Barrier and Challenges of Electric Vehicle in India and Vehicle to Grid Optimisation,” Transportation Engineering, Vol. 4, p. 100057, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.treng.2021.100057.

A. Štilić, A. Puška, A. Đurić, and D. Božanić, “Electric Vehicles Selection based on Brčko District Taxi Service Demands, a Multi-Criteria Approach,” Urban Science, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 73, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/urbansci6040073.

Y. Li, M. K. Lim, W. Xiong, X. Huang, Y. Shi, and S. Wang, “An Electric Vehicle Routing Model with Charging Stations Consideration for Sustainable Logistics,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 1076–1106, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-08-2023-0581.

L. Svadlenka, V. Simic, M. Dobrodolac, D. Lazarevic, and G. Todorovic, “Picture Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery,” IEEE Access, Vol. 8, pp. 209393–209414, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3039010.

A. Puška, I. Stojanović, and A. Štilić, “The Influence of Objective Weight Determination Methods on Electric Vehicle Selection in Urban Logistics,” Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 117–129, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.56578/jimd020302.

J. Seydel, “Data Envelopment Analysis for Decision Support,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 81–95, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02635570610641004.

K. Pal, D. Saraswat, and N. Budhraja, “An Integrated Entropy-TOPSIS Approach for Electric Vehicle Selection,” International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, Vol. 36, pp. 311–318, 2023, doi: 10.52756/ijerr.2023.v36.028.

S. Bošković, L. Švadlenka, S. Jovčić, M. Dobrodolac, V. Simić, and N. Bacanin, “An Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalization (AROMAN)—A Case Study of the Electric Vehicle Selection Problem,” IEEE Access, Vol. 11, pp. 39496–39507, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3265818.

R. Sejwal, S. Pal, N. K. Singh, R. Saini, and N. Yuvraj, “Selection of Electric Vehicles using MCDM Techniques,” in Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, IOS Press BV, Nov. 2022, pp. 598–607. doi: 10.3233/ATDE220801.

Y. Li, J. Jia, S. Wu, and S. Guo, “Evaluation of Electric Vehicle Charging Facilities by using the MCDM Method,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics, 2023. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2450/1/012016.

Q. Wei and C. Zhou, “A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Electric Vehicle Supplier Selection of Government Agencies and Public Bodies in China,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 10540–10559, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22783-6.

M. Amin, N. Irawati, H. D. E. Sinaga, D. Retnosari, J. Maulani, and H. D. L. Raja, “Decision Support System Analysis for Selecting a Baby Cream Product with Preference Selection Index (PSI) Baby Sensitive Skin under 3 Year,” J Phys Conf Ser, Vol. 1933, No. 1, p. 012035, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012035.

A. Chadly, H. Y. Aldayyani, M. M. Hamasha, S. Amer, M. Maalouf, and A. Mayyas, “Selection of Optimal Strategy for Managing Decentralized Solar PV Systems Considering Uncertain Weather Conditions,” SCI Rep, Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 12269, May 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62891-6.

A. T. Demir and S. Moslem, “A Novel Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Enhancing the Management of Medical Waste Generated During the Coronavirus Pandemic,” Eng Appl Artif Intell, Vol. 133, p. 108465, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108465.

M. Hamurcu and T. Eren, “Applications of the MOORA and TOPSIS Methods for Decision of Electric Vehicles in Public Transportation Technology,” Transport, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 251–263, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3846/transport.2022.17783.

N. Wang, Y. Xu, A. Puška, Ž. Stević, and A. F. Alrasheedi, “Multi-Criteria Selection of Electric Delivery Vehicles using Fuzzy–Rough Methods,” Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 15, No. 21, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152115541.

A. H. Alamoodi et al., “Selection of Electric Bus Models using 2-Tuple Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy-based Decision-Making Model,” Expert Syst Appl, Vol. 249, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123498.

K. Maniya and M. G. Bhatt, “A Selection of Material using a Novel Type Decision-Making Method: Preference Selection Index Method,” Mater Des, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 1785–1789, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v14i5.5434

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 4 times
PDF - 1 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.