IT Governance Priorities using COBIT 2019 Design Factors for the STIE AMA Academic Information System

Gabriela Winanti, Evi Maria

Abstract


The Academic Information System (SIAKAD) is a core service that supports higher education operations and requires effective information technology (IT) governance to ensure regulatory compliance, data quality, risk management, and service continuity. This study aims to identify IT governance priorities for the STIE AMA Salatiga Academic Information System using the COBIT 2019 Design Factors before conducting a capability assessment. A qualitative research approach was employed, utilizing a structured COBIT 2019 assessment based on observations, interviews, and Design Factors questionnaires. The analysis evaluated the ten COBIT 2019 Design Factors to determine the importance scores of the 40 governance and management objectives. The results indicate that service stability orientation, regulatory compliance, risk management, and dependence on cloud/SaaS services collectively define eight priority objectives: MEA03, EDM03, APO12, APO14, DSS05, DSS02, APO08, and DSS04. The findings further reveal that, within a cloud/SaaS environment, IT governance priorities primarily focus on regulatory compliance, risk management, data governance, service security, external service provider management, and service continuity. The study demonstrates that the COBIT 2019 Design Factors provide an effective mechanism for identifying relevant governance and management objectives prior to capability assessment, thereby establishing a structured basis for prioritizing IT governance evaluation and improvement in accordance with organizational characteristics.

Keywords


academic information system; COBIT 2019; Cloud/SaaS; design factors; IT governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


R. F. Frogeri, D. J. Pardini, and G. R. Cunha, “Information Technology Governance in a Higher Education Institution: An IT Professionals’ Perception Analysis,” Int. J. Hum. Cap. Inf. Technol. Prof., Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 31–46, 2020, DOI: 10.4018/IJHCITP.2020010103.

B. Y. Fitriyani and A. H. Muhammad, “COBIT 2019 for Enhanced ICT Governance: A Case Study at a Higher Education Institution,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 45–62, 2025, DOI: 10.51519/journalisi.v7i1.972.

P. Khairunnisa, N. S. Nasution, I. Nirwana, and Megawati, “Evaluating Capability Level of Academic Information System using COBIT 2019 Framework at XYZ University,” Scientica, Vol. 2, No. 8, pp. 14–20, 2024.

E. Sahara, Fachruddin, and J. Devitra, “Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Universitas Nurdin Hamzah menggunakan Framework COBIT 2019,” J. Ilm. Media Sisfo, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 279–290, 2025, DOI: 10.33998/mediasisfo.2025.19.2.2489.

Anadya Tafdhilla, J. Hasna Iftinan, Azzahra Rahmadani, and Anita Wulansari, “Penilaian Penggunaan Framework COBIT 2019 dalam Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi pada Institusi Perguruan Tinggi,” Bull. Comput. SCI. Res., Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 91–100, 2023, DOI: 10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i1.314.

A. Winarni, Muswarman, and H. Mulyani, “Audit Sistem Informasi menggunakan COBIT 2019 (Studi Kasus SISFO Politeknik Enjinering Indorama),” J. Inf. Syst., Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 107–218, 2023, DOI: 10.51211/isbi.v7i2.2002.

W. Febriyani, F. R. Hendrawan, and T. F. Kusumasari, “Advancing Towards IT Maturity Governance Excellence: COBIT 2019 in Higher Education (Indonesia),” in 8th International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2023, 2023. DOI: 10.1109/ICIC60109.2023.10382082.

ISACA, COBIT 2019: Framework Introduction and Methodology. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://community.mis.temple.edu/mis5203sec001sp2019/files/2019/01/COBIT-2019-Framework-Introduction-and-Methodology_res_eng_1118.pdf

ISACA, COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. 2018. [Online]. Available: www.isaca.org

B. V. Tulus and A. R. Tanaamah, “Design of Information Technology Governance in Educational Institutions using COBIT 2019 Framework,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 31–43, Feb. 2023, DOI: 10.51519/journalisi.v5i1.408.

G. M. W. Tangka and E. Lompoliu, “Optimizing IT Governance in BTS.id: A COBIT 2019-based Analysis of Design Factors,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. SCI., Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 699–710, Apr. 2025, DOI: 10.57152/malcom.v5i2.1997.

S. De Haes, W. Van Grembergen, A. Joshi, and T. Huygh, Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Alignment and Value, 3rd editio. Springer International Publishing, 2020.

R. A. Kurniawan and E. Maria, “Prioritas Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi berbasis Design Factors COBIT 2019: Pendekatan berbasis Risiko dan Kepatuhan,” J. Algoritm., Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 820–829, May 2026, DOI: 10.33364/algoritma/v.23-1.3404.

W. G. Mokodaser, J. Y. Mambu, H. Koapaha, and E. Lompoliu, “Aligning Information Technology Governance with Business Goals using the COBIT 2019 Framework: A Case Study of a Innovation Consultancy Firm,” CogITo Smart J., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 548–560, 2024, DOI: 10.31154/cogito.v10i2.799.548-560.

W. Mangoki, D. Manongga, and A. Iriani, “IT Governance Design in XY University using COBIT 2019 Framework,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 111–122, Apr. 2024, DOI: 10.21456/vol14iss2pp111-122.

M. Y. Achiruddin and A. Rahman, “The Design Factor the Capability Level of Information Technology Governance and Recommendations for Improvement using COBIT 2019: A Case Study at a Private University in Palembang,” J. Comput. Networks, Archit. High Perform. Comput., Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 113–122, Jan. 2026, DOI: 10.47709/cnahpc.v8i1.7800.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v15i7.6590

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 6 times
PDF - 1 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.